To content | To menu | To search

Politics

The European Citizen Initiative (ECI) ..........paradigm shift or blowing in the wind? by Nicoleta Sovre, MA University for Peace (Costa Rica)

“signature collection rules which vary significantly between countries and a too-short deadline will make it difficult for an ECI to succeed. A ban on treaty amendments and unclear Commission response to a successful ECI will discourage ECIs on many of the most important topics facing the EU. Unless these are changed, the ECI could become a PR tool rather than a real democratic instrument.” (Carsten Berg, ECI Campaign Coordinator)

The European Citizen Initiative (ECI), having its legal framework set in Article 11, Paragraph 4 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU)and Article 24, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), is designed to become the bridge between EU citizens and the EU agenda and aims at diminishing the EU's democratic deficit. More exactly, as stated in the Lisbon Treaty, it enables one million citizens, from a significant number of member states to challenge the legislation of the European Commission and to speak out their requests. Still, the ECI seems to be more hot air as European political decisions up to now are much more influenced by states, companies and lobbyists than by the european citizens. On March 31st 2010m a draft regulation, which encompasses practical aspects, on the ECI was adopted. That draft is now being negotiated with Council and the European Parliament....Deadline: December 13th.

The European Citizen Initiative (ECI) ..........paradigm shift or blowing in the wind?

So, what's at stake? Institutions trying to pass rules that would diminsh citizens involvement........now, that's pretty clear. On the ground, this translates into how many member states constitute a significant number. The answer of the Commission is at least nine member states while the Parlament answered five member states. Regarding checking admissibility of the initiatives and how long organisers should have to collect signatures, the Commission and Council plan calls for a 12-month limit, while MEPs have called for between 18 and 24 months. Again, the MEP seems to be the good guy as it doesn't support Council's idea requiring citizens to identify themselves before they sign. According to the press released by the ECI on Monday November 29th, the ECI is at risk of becoming an instrument of: de-facto discrimination based on nationality, artificial restriction of citizens’ initiative rights going as far as even not to be used.

It goes beyond the purpose of this text to cover implications of the ECI, such as what shall happen if there is a petition of the majority asking for abusive measures against any unconfortable minorities and where to draw the human rights line. However, I believe that before signing or not signing the petition, it is worth considering a 'what' happens 'if'.....or 'if'........

by Nicoleta Sovre, MA University for Peace (Costa Rica)

Bucharest blog is back: following Basescu's 'stealing' comments on Roma

I was a writer for this Bucharest cafebabel.com blog for a couple of months - at the end of 2007 - immediately afterwards I left for an Internship in Brussels, which overwhelmed my capcity to deliver. During the years that followed, I lost enthusiasm toward the power of the written word.

When reading this morning news (6 November) I came across an article about Romania's Head of State Traian Băsescu - who declared on Wednesday in Ljubljana, that most Roma traditionally make a living out of their stealing. He presented it as a cultural trait of this ethnic group. I felt a sudden impulse to translate it and 'send it to CafeBabel', my old way of ringing an 'EU' bell, vis a vis political and social realities of my country.

Read the translation below, and let us know your thoughts.


**

Active Watch (Media Monitoring Agency) condemns Traian Băsescu's declarations with regard to the situation of nomad Roma and claims that the presidential public status obliges him to deliver an equidistant inclusive speech, which must support an official position of the Romanian authorities. Through statements of the type “many Roma, traditionally, make a living from their thefts” or “we have yet another problem that must be spoken out and which renders difficult the integration of nomad Roma – too few of them are willing to work”, the head of state fails in bringing consistency to the bilateral relations as well as in maintaining a tolerant social climate in Romania - shows a Friday release of Active Watch (Media Monitoring Agency).

“Traian Băsescu's public status obliges him to deliver an equidistant inclusive speech and which must support an official position of the Romanian authorities, dissociated from the convictions of the person Traian Băsescu who has the right to have, normally, any opinion, on any subject.” - claims the quoted source. Active Watch (Media Monitoring Agency), about president Basescu's discourse on the Roma minority: "it is framed by negative stereotypes and values personal experiences without considering any scientific studies, therefore not only is it inappropriate in our century, but extremely worrying given that it comes from the president of a state, who is delegated to represent the interests of all its citizens, Roma included."

Consequently, the division of citizens in “good ethnic groups” and “criminal ethnic groups” by the head of state in person, is qualified as “an irresponsible dangerous endeavour”, likely to legitimize racist and discriminatory attitudes throughout the whole Romanian society. Such approach blocks any chance of harmonization between the two cultures, deepening the social distance between Roma and non Roma, says the quoted source. After too many such deviations, Traian Băsescu reconfirms himself as a president who knocks down the bridge which He himself should build.

Other tens of NGOs, sociologists and writers condemned the statements of president Traian Băsescu towards Roma and asked the sanctioning of such discourse by the competent institutions, reccommending the parties to adopt a European document for a non racist society. According to the signatories of a collective document – among which The Centre for Juridical Resources, The Institute for Public Policies, The Social Democrat Association of Transylvanian Roma, The Florists' Association Bucharest, The Roma Journalists' Association – the president's statement is far from a novelty, and more of “just another episode of a permanent reality: the stigmatization of Roma by the high representatives of the Romanian state.”

The signatories of the document claimed that the “consistently supported statements of the president, in light of which Romanian Roma are nomads, lack truth”. Explicitly, they were forcedfully sedentarized during the communist regime, thus those who make use of their right to free movement within the EU don't lead a nomad, but a sedentary life. In this context, they asked for the sanctioning of the presindent's speech by competent authorities, including the political sanctioning of those persons who promote a denigrating and stigmatizing speech. Additionally, they advised the Romanian political parties to adopt the “Charter of European Political Parties for a non-racist Society”.

President Traian Băsescu declared on Wednesday, in Ljubljana, that the cultural objective of nomad Roma is to move freely from place to place, thus denying this right to them would equal the distruction of a cultural pillar – admitting that most of these “traditionally make a living out of their stealing.” “In spite of signals from some governments to potentially block Romania's accession to the Schengen space as a consequence of the Roma issue or other issues - e.g. the Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification - we treat these statements as nothing more but statements which fail to comply with the mere Accession Treaty between EU and Romania”, declared Traian Băsescu when answering a question addressed by Slovenian journalists.

Geanina Gabriela Turcanu

Political Science MA CEU 2009, Project Assistant Vienna Faculty of Law

PDL – the new presidential party

At the beginning of December, Emil Boc (PD) şi Theodor Stolojan (PLD) announced the merger of parties lead by them and a new political force came into being in Romania: The Liberal Democrat Party. Otherwise, the merger was predictable since before the European Parliament elections, although officially denied, for it is no mystery that Theodor Stolojan is closed to Băsescu, and PLD received help from PD during election campaign, at “class master’s” indications.

sigle_PD_PLD.JPG

Continue reading ...

The 35 euro-parliamentarians - on their way to Strasbourg

Today was the first working day for the 35 euro-parliamentarians, intended to represent Romania in the European Parliament after the elections on 25th of November.

Continue reading ...

Electoral Campaign with European Personalities

25th November - the date for the European Parliament Elections is approaching, so the electoral campaign is becoming more intense. Besides of making use of the Romanian crisis in Italy for drawing the debate into their favour, two of the most important parties brought last week to Romania, international guests to support them.

Continue reading ...

The vanity of our highest politicians drives Romania to chaos

For the last weeks, the Romanian political scene was split by the disputes on organizing in the same day the referendum for the uninominal voting system and the European Parliament elections, especially because there will be used different human and financial resources for each ballot.

Continue reading ...

Elections for the European Parliament

The final lists with the candidates for the European Parliament elections, set on 25th November, have been sent yesterday to the Central Electoral Office. The political parties finally decided whom to send to Brussels, after many negotiations with their members, as they didn’t want to leave Bucharest not to loose their internal influence and positions.

European Parliament

Continue reading ...

The activity of Romanian MPs

The Public Politics Institute released last Friday a study on the parliamentary activity for the last session, February-June 2007. The criteria used for evaluating the Romanian MPs were their presence or absence to the vote, the number of legislative projects proposed, the number of questions addressed to the public authorities and their loyalty for the party (expressed through their votes).

CAMERA DEPUTATILOR - SEDINTA IN PLEN

Continue reading ...

Entries feed